Making a god out of a machine... is not good for people. Not very good Why this is not the best decision for Monaco

“Artificial intelligence is already here,” says Christopher Kutarna, a political scientist at the Oxford Martin School at the University of Oxford. - But the curious question is this: where are we on this segment? How talented will the autonomous brains we create turn out to be? This speech was given by Coutharna in a cool tent on a hot summer day in a field in Oxfordshire. At the Wilderness festival where it all happened, the political scientist discussed AI with colleagues Robert Smith, Matthew Taylor and John Lloyd.

Before we can understand what intelligent computers can or will become, we need to understand what we mean by intelligence, intelligence. When it comes to artificial intelligence, we tend to raise the bar, Kutarna says. You might think that it takes intelligence to win a game of chess, but the best grandmaster in the world was beaten by a computer in 1997. And today, anyone can download a game on their phone in which they will also lose at chess.

The game started

We've also seen AI beat humans in a mind game (like Jeopardy!), and similarly, just recently, beat a human in the hardest Chinese game of Go.

Does this mean that computers have intelligence? "Don't believe the news," says Smith. “There were no breakthroughs in the field of AI.” The speed of computers is growing and surpassing our own speed of thinking, but intelligence has remained as computer-generated as it was, he says.

To fully understand intelligence, we need to understand how the brain works, and then the human mind. And we're far from that, Lloyd says. “Don't buy a book called How the Brain Works,” he told enthusiastic listeners, “because we just don't know it. We don't know anything about consciousness."

Smith is not at all sure that consciousness exists. “Maybe it's a combination of memory and imagination,” he says. “It seems to me that consciousness is an illusion - when we stopped believing in the soul, consciousness came to replace it.”

Intelligent machines?

And even if we could create an intelligent machine, could we put it to good use? Our brains are capable of incredible things, but these are the things our boring lives are made up of, says Lloyd. "The more complex the device, the more banal information it processes," he says. “The phone today has more processing power than the human mind, but we use it to take selfies.”

More troubling is the idea that by developing AI, we will expect them to solve all problems, like from a deity. “I think we live in a world where technology has become a religion,” Taylor says. “We are back to the medieval notions that God decides what the world should be, only today God has become technology.”

This is partly due to the politics that drive technology, Taylor said. “Silicon Valley has its own approach to problems called solutionism [literally: solution-oriented], and it is based on the idea that all the problems in the world can be solved with the help of technology,” he says.

Kutarna agrees: “We expect technology to solve problems faster and faster, until finally there is none left and we live in a techno-utopia.”

Technology should serve us

You can say as much as you want that technology sees everything and everyone knows that in 30 years all problems will be solved. But this is the wrong approach. At any rate of technological development, we will not be able to provide machines with human intelligence if we do not learn how to instill artificial empathy in them.

Empathy (empathy) and emotions are especially important in the work of our brain, recalls Taylor. We begin to form emotional memories long before we form memories of events, and these memories shape our behavior and interactions with people for the rest of our lives. No computer can interact with a human in a way that feels completely natural to all of us.

Maybe that's what makes us special, Taylor says. “We need to fundamentally connect to our humanism and love ourselves. We need to get back in awe of what an amazing species we are."

According to hi-news

And even if we could create an intelligent machine, could we put it to good use? Our brains are capable of incredible things, but these are the things our boring lives are made up of, says Lloyd. "The more complex the device, the more banal information it processes," he says. “The phone today has more processing power than the human mind, but we use it to take selfies.”

More troubling is the idea that by developing AI, we will expect them to solve all problems, like from a deity. “I think we live in a world where technology has become a religion,” Taylor says. “We are back to the medieval notions that God decides what the world should be, only today God has become technology.”

This is partly due to the politics that drive technology, Taylor said. “Silicon Valley has its own approach to problems called solutionism [literally: solution-oriented], and it is based on the idea that all the problems in the world can be solved with the help of technology,” he says.

Kutarna agrees: “We expect technology to solve problems faster and faster, until finally there is none left and we live in a techno-utopia.”

Technology should serve us

You can say as much as you want that technology sees everything and everyone knows that in 30 years all problems will be solved. But this is the wrong approach. At any rate of technological development, we will not be able to provide machines with human intelligence if we do not learn how to instill artificial empathy in them.

Empathy (empathy) and emotions are especially important in the work of our brain, recalls Taylor. We begin to form emotional memories long before we form memories of events, and these memories shape our behavior and interactions with people for the rest of our lives. No computer can interact with a human in a way that feels completely natural to all of us.

Maybe that's what makes us special, Taylor says. “We need to fundamentally connect to our humanism and love ourselves. We need to get back in awe of what an amazing species we are."

Adverb, number of synonyms: 15 brilliant (51) highly commendable (2) wonderful ... Synonym dictionary

very good- - [A.S. Goldberg. English Russian Energy Dictionary. 2006] Topics energy in general EN best bestBB … Technical Translator's Handbook

very visible defects- 3.25.6 very visible defects: Defects and deviations from perfect symmetry, which are very easy to detect at a magnification of 10×, including those easily visible to the naked eye. Source: GOST R 52913 2008: Diamonds. Classification.… … Dictionary-reference book of terms of normative and technical documentation

What is very good in French, May be exactly mean in Russian. A. P. Sumarokov. Epistle on the Russian language. Wed In order to further ennoble the Russian language, almost half of the words were thrown out of the conversation altogether, and therefore ... ... Michelson's Big Explanatory Phraseological Dictionary (original spelling)

It would be very good, but it is no good. See TALK BITCH... IN AND. Dal. Proverbs of the Russian people

Adverb, number of synonyms: 1 wherever you throw, everywhere a wedge (2) ASIS Synonym Dictionary. V.N. Trishin. 2013 ... Synonym dictionary

This gravy goes very well with a simple boiled- Cuisine: Type of dish: Cooking time (minutes): 10 Ingredients: Cooking recipe … Encyclopedia of culinary recipes

That can exactly be stingy in Russian. A.P. Sumarokov. Epistle on the Russian language. Wed In order to ennoble the Russian language more, almost half of the words were thrown out of the conversation altogether, and therefore it was very often necessary to resort to French ... ... Michelson's Big Explanatory Phraseological Dictionary

VERY, east. really, adv. amplification; very, extremely extremely sat. porato, east. hurts (from the big one?), south. hefty, app. douzha (short. douzhe); firmly, strongly, strongly, much: tver. ugly, church velmy. A lot, a little. Very good, bad.… … Dahl's Explanatory Dictionary

Books

• , Vadim Korostylev. From the publisher: Vadim Korostylev is an amazing, rare romantic in our times. He wrote fairy tales, but the moral of these tales is unusual. Behind it is not common worldly sense, but a high feeling ...
• It is very good that so far we feel bad..., V. Korostylev. Vadim Korostylev is an amazing, rare romantic in our times. He wrote fairy tales, but the moral of these tales is unusual. Behind it is not common worldly sense, but a high sense of justice, ...