Based on the results of the meeting of the working group, the approved protocol. Minutes of the meetings of the working group on fgos. Short and full varieties

28.10.2019

As a result of the meeting, meeting or meeting, a protocol is almost always drawn up according to the appropriate model. Features of filling and finished example document can be found below.

In the course of the meeting, a protocol is always drawn up, and the management decides for itself which model is best to use. This document performs several functions at once:

Records information about all those present and speakers.
Contains all the key decisions taken during this meeting.
It reflects the actual state of the negotiation process, fixes the key agreements at this stage.

Thus, the main task of the document is to record the fact of the meeting and all the decisions that were made as a result.

NOTE. Not all meetings are recorded, so the company's management has the right to independently decide in which case to draw up a reporting document, in which it is not. Typically, minutes are used at those meetings that discuss issues that directly affect the future development of the organization.

The legislation has not developed any requirements for the content of the document, and even more so there is no single form. Therefore, each company can use its own form. Including, you can use different forms for specific cases (for example, a department meeting, an extraordinary meeting or a joint meeting with representatives of the counterparty).

The document usually contains the following information:

The full name of the company, the number of the protocol and the date of its compilation. The numbering can be carried out through - with the beginning of the countdown from each calendar year.
Composition of those present:

chairman of the commission;
executive secretary fixing the entries in the minutes;
the rest of those present - usually the list is placed at the end of the document.

Agenda - i.e. list of issues to be discussed. Compiled in advance and communicated to all those present (usually special announcements are made a few days in advance for meetings).
List of speakers (name, position, topic of speech, issues raised).
Decisions that were made as a result of the meeting.
Signatures of the chairman and secretary, transcripts of signatures (surname and initials).
If additional documents are attached to the protocol, as well as materials of audio recordings, photo and video filming, this fact must be reflected in the document. At the end, the word “Appendices” is written and the names of documents and other materials, their number and type (original or copy), as well as the number of pages are listed.

Form and sample 2019

In the simplest case, the form looks like this.

And as an example, you can choose this form:

NOTE. In the “RESOLVED” section, describing the decision, the results of the voting procedure are often given, if it was held at the meeting. The results are recorded by a simple summation of the votes "FOR", "AGAINST" and abstentions.

Short and full varieties

Different meetings can be held within the same organization. The importance of a meeting depends on the issues it addresses. And they also determine the choice of one or another sample, according to which the protocol will be drawn up. In general, there are 2 types of document:

Extract from the protocol

If it is necessary to obtain some information from the protocol, an extract is drawn up. This document is an exact copy of part of the protocol. The extract must record the date of preparation of the main document, its number, and the name of the company. The accuracy of the copy is certified by the personal signature of the secretary and / or chairman of the meeting.

Features of conducting

In the case of reporting meetings at the end of the year, extended forms of the document are usually chosen. If we are talking about a meeting of a separate structural unit, managers, as a rule, choose the simplest template.

The features of recording facts and storing the protocol are as follows:

A sample minutes of the meeting is approved by the management of the company or a specific structural unit of the organization.
Conducted directly at the time of the meeting. A special employee is appointed responsible for the execution of the document. In most cases, this is the secretary who also acts as meeting secretary.
In order to avoid inaccuracies, incorrect interpretation of the speakers' phrases, additional recording of all events occurring during the meeting is often made. The means of audio and video recording are used. Subsequently, if necessary, transcripts of speeches are given in the annex to the protocol - exact quotations of what employees and other invited persons said.
The number of original copies is compiled depending on the situation. As a rule, one original is enough. However, in the case of a meeting with the participation of a partner (representatives of another company), it becomes necessary to draw up 2 originals. Usually such meetings are held at different stages of business negotiations.
As for copies of the document, you can make any number of them. Such a need arises when holding meetings, the decisions of which are binding on all departments of the organization. Then copies are sent to all structural units. As a rule, they are certified by the original seal and handwritten signature leader.

To avoid possible inaccuracies, audio and video recording tools are used to subsequently accurately reproduce the speech of each employee or invited person in shorthand.

Protocol of the meeting- a document that records all the events that take place at a meeting of employees of the enterprise team. He is not strictly binding documents, but in some cases it is really necessary.

FILES Open these files online 2 files

The role of the protocol

Meetings in organizations, regardless of their status, business line and size, are held with a certain frequency. They allow you to solve many current problems, take the necessary measures in a timely manner to resolve complex issues, determine the company's development strategy, etc.

However, not all meetings are recorded using minutes and this is not a violation of the law. In principle, the company's management has the right to determine which meetings need to be recorded, and which can be held without issuing this document.

The main function of the protocol is to record in writing all the tasks, questions, opinions voiced at the meeting and, most importantly, collective decisions.

The more thorough and detailed the protocol is, the better.

Typically, minutes are needed for those meetings that have a direct impact on the future of the firm. It is also recommended to record meetings with the participation of representatives of other enterprises and employees of state institutions.

Meeting order

A meeting is not an event that is held, as they say, out of the blue. It requires careful pre-training, which is usually dealt with by a responsible employee appointed for this by a special order of the director. He collects Required documents, writes a list of current issues and pressing problems that need to be addressed, notifies all potential participants of the upcoming meeting and conducts other preparatory activities.

It should be noted that employees of the enterprise who have received information about the upcoming meeting and an invitation to participate in it may refuse, but only if there are good and fairly good reasons, since the meeting is part of their job duties.

The meeting usually has its own chairman, who monitors its progress, announces the agenda, and conducts voting. Most often this is the head of the company, but there may be another employee. At the same time, information about the chairman must be included in the minutes.

From the very beginning of the meeting, all events taking place at it are carefully recorded. Moreover, this is done in different ways: keeping a protocol does not exclude the use of photo and video recording tools.

After the end of the meeting, the minutes must be signed by the secretary and the chairman of the meeting, as well as, if necessary, by its participants, who thus confirm that all the information entered into it is correct.

Who should draw up the protocol

The function of taking minutes is usually the responsibility of the enterprise secretary or other employee assigned to perform this mission right at the meeting. At the same time, the person chosen to keep the protocol must have a clear understanding of how and why this is done and have at least minimal skills in writing protocol documents.

Drawing up a protocol

Today, the law does not provide for a strict unified form of the minutes of the meeting, so that organizations can draw it up in any form or according to the model approved in the accounting policy of the company. However, certain information must be included:

Document Number;
date of creation;
name of company;
the locality where the company is registered;
a list of persons present at the meeting (with the inclusion of their positions, full name);
data on the chairman of the meeting and the secretary;
agenda (i.e. those issues that need to be addressed);
the fact of voting (if any) and its results;
the outcome of the meeting.

Sometimes the exact time (up to minutes) of the beginning and end of the meeting is entered into the protocol - this allows you to discipline employees and optimize the time spent on such meetings in the future.

If necessary, some additional documents, photo and video evidence can be attached to the minutes of the meeting. If there are any, their presence should be reflected in the minutes of the meeting as a separate item.

It should be noted that the protocol must be kept very carefully, errors and corrections must be avoided, and it is completely unacceptable to introduce unreliable or deliberately false information into it. If such moments are identified in the event that the internal documentation of the company is checked by regulatory authorities, the company may be severely punished.

Basic rules for registration of the protocol

The protocol, as a rule, is drawn up in a single copy, but if necessary, copies of it can be made, the number of which is not limited.

The document must be signed by the direct compiler, the secretary, as well as all members of the meeting.

You can draw up a protocol on a simple sheet of A4 format or on the letterhead of the organization - this does not matter, just like whether it is kept in handwritten form or filled out on a computer. It is not necessary to certify it with the seal of the enterprise, since since 2016 legal entities by law, they have every right not to use seals and stamps to certify their documentation.

Once formalized and properly approved, the minutes should be kept along with other company documents that record internal meetings, negotiations, and meetings. After the loss of relevance, it should be sent for storage to the archive of the enterprise, where it should be located established by law or internal local acts company for a period (at least 3 years), after which it can be disposed of (this procedure must also be carried out strictly in the manner prescribed by law).

Protocol #1

from 08.12.2010

Present: 7 people

Meeting questions:

1. Regulatory framework for the implementation of the new educational process in primary school in accordance with the requirements of the FGOS.

3. Analysis and approval of the "Regulations on the working group on the introduction of the Federal State Educational Standard"

On the first question, Deputy director for water resources management Kunina L.V. She went into more detail about normative documents according to the Federal State Educational Standard.

Order "On the Enactment of the Federal State Educational Standard of the IEO" in the educational institution

« Job description teachers primary school»;

"Job description of the deputy. director for water resources management”;

"Plan - a schedule for the introduction of the Federal State Educational Standard at the initial stage general education

On the second question, we reviewed the presentation “ Guidelines on the compilation of the PLO IEO. Discussed questions about the distribution of responsibilities for the preparation of the program, the creation of microgroups.

Makova L.P. spoke on the third question. .In her speech, she introduced the “Regulations on the working group on the introduction of the Federal State Educational Standard”.

Resolved:

Start work on the formation of a bank of legal documents on the introduction of the Federal State Educational Standard.
Allocate responsibility in the development of the OOP IEO:

Explanatory note - Makova L.P.;

Program spiritual and moral development and education of students at the stage of primary general education. - Fedoseeva I.V.;

Planned results of mastering the basic educational program of primary general education by students. - Kanashina A.A.; Baykova I.V.

Basic curriculum - Makova L.P.;

Formation program universal action for students at the stage of primary general education - Gerasimova N.N.;

individual program subjects, courses - Gerasimova N.N., Sedova S.S., Afanaseva I.V., Fedoseeva I.V., Yatsina M.E., Denisova O.Yu., Kanashina A.A.

The program for the formation of a culture of a healthy and safe lifestyle - Sedova S.S.;

The program of correctional work - Afanasyeva I.V.

The system for assessing the achievement of the planned results of mastering the basic educational program of primary general education - Denisova O.Yu., Yatsina M.E.;

3. Approve the “Regulations on the working group on the introduction of the Federal State Educational Standard”

4. Organize methodological work with the team on the introduction of the Federal State Educational Standard.

Protocol #2

Meetings of the working group on the introduction of the Federal State Educational Standard

from 15.12.2010

Present: 7 people

"Organizational and methodological support of the Federal State Educational Standard of the new generation"

Deputy director for water resources management Makova L.P. spoke on the issue of organizing methodical work. She acquainted with the work plan for the organizational and methodological support of the introduction of the Federal State Educational Standard

We discussed the plan and made additions. The question was raised about the need to provide consulting methodological support for primary school teachers on the implementation of the Federal State Educational Standard.

Deputy director for water resources management Makova L.P. spoke on the development of tools for studying the educational needs and interests of primary school students, requests from parents, diagnostics to identify professional difficulties for teachers during the transition to the Federal State Educational Standard.

Deputy director for water resources management Makova L.P. spoke on information support introduction of GEF NOU. Discussed the forms of informing participants in the educational process about the progress of the introduction of the Federal State Educational Standard: use information resources OU (school website), studying the opinions of parents using a questionnaire, holding parent meetings, organizing a parent lecture hall, introducing a section into the public report of the educational institution containing information on the progress of the introduction of the Federal State Educational Standard.

Resolved:

Approve the plan for organizational and methodological support for the introduction of the Federal State Educational Standard, with the possibility of adjustment if necessary.
Teacher Afanasyeva I.V. compile a package of methods for conducting diagnostics in educational institutions to study the needs and interests of all participants in the educational process in connection with the introduction of the Federal State Educational Standard.
Social educator Fedoseyeva I.V. organize work with parents on the introduction of the Federal State Educational Standard.
The programmer should ensure that the school website is updated with documents and materials on the introduction of the Federal State Educational Standard.

Protocol #3

Meetings of the working group on the introduction of the Federal State Educational Standard

from 22.12.2010

Present: 7 people

Meeting question:

"Organization of extracurricular activities in the framework of the implementation of the second generation of the Federal State Educational Standards"

On this issue, the following spoke:

Deputy Director for WRM Makova L.P. Acquainted with the areas of extracurricular activities within the framework of 10 hours of the basic curriculum. The number of hours for each direction.

The head of the MO primary school Gerasimova N.N. introduced teaching materials introduction of the Federal State Educational Standards, provided by SKIPKRO, with exemplary programs for extracurricular activities for elementary school (from the experience of approbation of the Federal State Educational Standards in the Stavropol Territory).

We discussed a possible option for the introduction of extracurricular activities -the use of educational programs after school hours on the basis of MBOU secondary school No. 34

Resolved:

Organize the study and discussion of programs of extracurricular activities in the team.
Determine the optimal model for organizing the educational process, which ensures the variability of extracurricular activities of students, taking into account the possibilities of the school.
Organize methodological assistance to teachers in choosing programs for extracurricular activities.

Protocol #4

working group meetings

from 25.02.2011

Present: 7 people.

Agenda:

Analysis and approval of the explanatory note to the Federal State Educational Standard of the new generation at the initial stage
Discussion of the project of the planned results of the students' mastering the BEP of the IEO.

Proceedings of the meeting

A working group of 7 considered explanatory note to the main educational program of primary general education, developed in accordance with the requirements of the federal state educational standard of primary general education.

Makova L.P. She noted that the novelty of the program lies in the fact that schoolchildren form the basis of the ability to learn, the ability to organize their own learning activities, its planning, ability to control and give self-esteem. This acquires features of adequacy and reflection.
Denisova O.Yu. spoke on the second question. She focused on three main groups of planned results of mastering the main general education program:

Personal results;
Meta-subject results;
Subject results.

The implementation of the main educational program is based on a system-active approach, which involves:

Education and development of personality;
Realization of personality in a particular educational institution;
Accounting for individual, age, psychological and physiological characteristics;
Ensuring continuity between the various levels of general and vocational education.

Resolved:

Approve the explanatory note to the PLO IEO educational institution as part of the introduction of a new generation of GEF at the initial stage.
To take as a basis the planned results of the students' mastering the BEP of the IEO.

Protocol #5

working group meetings

on the introduction of a new generation of Federal State Educational Standards

from 02.03.2011

There were: 7 people.

Agenda:

Analysis and approval of the planned results of the students' mastering the BEP of the IEO.
Discussion of the draft program for the formation of universal educational activities (UUD) for students at the stage of primary general education..

The course of the meeting.

On the first question, they listened to Kanashina A.A., who presented the material worked out on the planned results of the students' mastering the BEP of the IEO. The Federal State Educational Standard for Primary General Education (clause 9) establishes requirements for the results of students who have mastered the basic educational program of primary general education:

personal, including the readiness and ability of students for self-development, the formation of motivation for learning and cognition, the value-semantic attitudes of students, reflecting their individual and personal positions, social competencies, personal qualities; the formation of the foundations of civic identity.

metasubject , which includes the universal learning activities mastered by students (cognitive, regulatory and communicative), providing mastery core competencies, which form the basis of the ability to learn, and interdisciplinary concepts.

subject, including the experience, mastered by students in the course of studying the subject area, of activity specific to this subject area in obtaining new knowledge, its transformation and application, as well as the system of fundamental elements of scientific knowledge that underlie the modern scientific picture of the world.

The system of planned results gives an idea of what kind of actions - cognitive, personal, regulatory, communicative, refracted through the specifics of the content of a particular

another subject - students will master in the course of the educational process.

On the second question, they listened to Gerasimova N.N., who highlighted the main issues of the program for the formation of universal educational activities (UUD) for students at the stage of primary general education. Discussed the concept, functions, composition, types and characteristics of UUD in junior school age; connection of UUD with the content of educational subjects. We considered the issue of ensuring the continuity of the program for the formation of universal educational activities in the transition from preschool to primary and basic general education.

Resolved:

Approve the planned results of the students' mastering the BEP of the IEO.
To take as a basis the draft program for the formation of universal educational activities for students at the stage of primary general education.
To study, make additions to the draft program for the formation of universal educational activities for students at the stage of primary general education.

Protocol #6

working group meetings

on the introduction of a new generation of Federal State Educational Standards

from 11.03.2011

Present: 7 people.

Agenda:

Analysis and approval of the program for the formation of UUD (universal learning activities) for students at the stage of primary general education.
Discussion of the program of individual subjects, courses.

The course of the meeting.

On the first question, they listened to the head of the methodological association of primary classes Gerasimova N.N., who outlined the program for the formation of UUD (universal educational activities). They represent a system of generalized personality-oriented goals of education that allow further refinement and concretization, which ensures the definition and identification of all components of the planned results to be formed and evaluated.

On the second question, they listened to primary school teachers Sedova S.S., Afanaseva I.V., Fedoseeva I.V. We stopped at the main changes in the programs of subjects and courses. A feature of the content of modern primary education is not only the answer to the question of what the student should know (remember, reproduce), but also the formation of universal educational activities in personal, communicative, cognitive, regulatory areas that provide the ability to organize independent learning activities. It is also necessary to extend general educational skills and abilities to the formation of ICT - the competence of students.

Resolved:

Approve the programs for the formation of UUD (universal educational activities) for students at the stage of primary general education.

Take as a basis the program of subjects, courses.

To study, make additions to the developed programs of subjects, courses.

Protocol #7

working group meetings

on the introduction of a new generation of Federal State Educational Standards

from 16.03.2011

There were: 7 people.

Agenda:

Analysis and approval of the program of individual subjects, courses.
Discussion of the draft program of spiritual and moral development, education of students at the stage of primary general education.

The course of the meeting.

On the first question, the primary school teacher Gerasimova N.N.

On the second question, they listened to Fedoseyeva I.V., who outlined the regulatory, legal and methodological basis of the program of spiritual and moral development and education of students at the stage of primary general education.

The pedagogical organization of the process of spiritual and moral development and education of students provides for the coordination of the efforts of many social subjects: schools, families, institutions of additional education, culture and sports, traditional religious organizations and public associations, including youth movements and organizations. The program of spiritual and moral development and education of students contains eight sections. During the meeting, the main issues on the proposed sections were discussed.

Resolved:

1. Approve the programs of individual subjects, courses.

2. Take as a basis the draft program of spiritual and moral development, education of students at the stage of primary general education.

3. Study the draft program of spiritual and moral development, education of students at the stage of primary general education, make additions and changes.

Protocol #8

working group meetings

on the introduction of a new generation of Federal State Educational Standards

from 23.03.2011

There were: 7 people.

Agenda:

Analysis and approval of the program of spiritual and moral development, education of students at the CEO level.
Discussion of the draft program for the formation of a healthy and safe lifestyle culture.

The course of the meeting.

On the first question, they listened to Fedoseeva I.V., who outlined the program of spiritual and moral development, education of students at the CEO level with additions made.

On the second question, they listened to Sedova S.S., who spoke about the main points of the program for the formation of a culture of a healthy and safe lifestyle for students in accordance with the definition of the Federal State Educational Standard.

When choosing a strategy for educating a culture of a healthy and safe lifestyle in primary school age, it is necessary, taking into account the psychological and psychophysiological characteristics of age, to rely on the zone of actual development, based on the fact that the formation of the value of health and healthy lifestyle of life is a necessary and obligatory component of the health-preserving work of the school. Nurse highlighted issues related to the new SANPIN.

Resolved:

Approve the program of spiritual and moral development, education of students at the NEO level
To adopt as a basis the draft program for the formation of a culture of a healthy and safe lifestyle.
Study the draft program for the formation of a culture of a healthy and safe lifestyle, make the necessary changes and additions.

Protocol #9

working group meetings

on the introduction of a new generation of Federal State Educational Standards

from 04/06/2011

There were: 7 people.

Agenda:

Analysis and approval of the program for the formation of a culture of a healthy and safe lifestyle.
Discussion of the draft system for assessing the achievement of the planned results of the development of the BEP IEO.

The course of the meeting.

On the first question, they listened to Sedova S.S., who outlined the program for the formation of a culture of a healthy and safe lifestyle for students at the CEO level with additions made.

On the second question, they listened to Denisova O.Yu., who introduced general provisions, object, the main functions of the evaluation system. The system for assessing the achievement of the planned results of mastering the basic educational program of primary general education involves an integrated approach to assessing the results of education, which allows assessing the achievement of students of all three groups results of education: personal, meta-subject and subject.

We discussed the features of assessing personal, meta-subject and subject results. We worked out the question of the "Portfolio of Achievements" as a tool for assessing the dynamics of individual educational achievements.

A portfolio of achievements is not only a modern, effective form of assessment, but also an effective tool for solving a number of important pedagogical tasks, which allows maintaining high educational motivation of students. We considered the issue of the final assessment of the graduate and its use in the transition from primary to basic general education.

Resolved:

Approve the program for the formation of a culture of a healthy and safe lifestyle.
To take as a basis the draft system for assessing the achievement of the planned results of the development of the BEP of the IEO.
To study the draft system for assessing the achievement of the planned results of the development of the BEP of the IEO, to make the necessary changes and additions.

Protocol #10

working group meetings

on the introduction of a new generation of Federal State Educational Standards

from 12.04.2011

There were: 7 people.

Agenda:

Analysis and approval of the system for assessing the achievement of the planned results of the development of the BEP IEO.
Discussion of the draft program of correctional work at the initial level.

The course of the meeting.

On the first question, Denisov O.Yu., who outlined the section of the BEP of the IEO “The system for assessing the achievement of the planned results of the development of the IEO of the IEO” with additions and changes.

On the second question, they listened to Afanasyeva I.V., who introduced the main issues of the program of correctional work. The program is based on the "Exemplary program of the Stavropol Territory". The program is aimed at ensuring the correction of deficiencies in the physical and (or) mental development of children with disabilities (HIA) and assisting children in this category in mastering the Educational Program. We discussed the theoretical and methodological foundations, structure and content of the program of correctional work. We stopped at the discussion of the content of the five modules of the program: conceptual, diagnostic and consultative, correctional and developing, treatment and prevention, social and pedagogical.

Resolved:

Approve the section of the PEP of the IEO "The system for assessing the achievement of the planned results of the development of the PEP of the IEO."
Take as a basis the draft program of corrective work at the initial level.
Study the draft program of corrective work at the initial level, make the necessary additions and changes.

Protocol No. 11

working group meetings

on the introduction of a new generation of Federal State Educational Standards

from 16.04.2011

There were: 7 people.

Agenda:

Analysis and approval of the program of corrective work at the initial level.
Discussion of the model of the program of extracurricular activities in the framework of the introduction of the GEF of a new generation.

The course of the meeting.

On the first question, they listened to Afanasyeva I.V., who introduced the program of corrective work with the additions and changes made.

On the second question, they listened to: Deputy Director for Water Resource Management L.P. Makova. about the selected areas of extracurricular activities. The programs of extracurricular activities within the framework of 10 hours, which are offered by the Federal State Educational Standard, were considered.

Fedoseev I.V. primary school teacher, who introduced the results of a survey of parents of future first-graders on the issue of extracurricular activities. Parents would like: dance, vocal courses, design, computer course, classes with a psychologist.

Deputy Director for UVR Makov L.P., who proposed a model for organizing extracurricular activities in secondary school No. 9 for the 2011-2012 academic year in connection with the introduction of new GEF.

Resolved:

Approve the program of corrective work in the initial link.
To familiarize the teaching staff with the model of extracurricular activities for the 2011-2012 academic year, with the directions and programs of extracurricular activities in the 1st grade. Taking into account the wishes of the parents, decide on the choice of extracurricular activities for grade 1 for the 2011-2012 academic year.

Protocol #1

working group meetings

on the introduction of GEF

from 06.12. 2010

Present: 9 people

Meeting plan:

1. Regulatory framework for the implementation of a new educational process in primary school in accordance with the requirements of the Federal State Educational Standard.

3. Analysis and approval of the "Regulations on the working group on the introduction of the Federal State Educational Standard"

On the first question, Deputy director for water resources management Nevzorov V.S. She introduced in more detail the normative documents on the Federal State Educational Standard.

Order "On the Enactment of the Federal State Educational Standard of the IEO" in the educational institution

"Job description of a primary school teacher";

"Job description of the deputy. director for water resources management”;

“The plan is a schedule for the introduction of the Federal State Educational Standard at the primary level of general education in the educational institution of the MOU “Padunskaya Sosh”.

On the second issue, the speech of the head of the IMO Gadlevskaya V.N. Discussed questions about the distribution of responsibilities for the preparation of the program, the creation of microgroups.

Nevzorova V.S. spoke on the third question. .In her speech, she introduced the “Regulations on the working group on the introduction of the Federal State Educational Standard”.

Resolved:

Start work on the formation of a bank of legal documents on the introduction of the Federal State Educational Standard.

Allocate responsibility in the development of the OOP IEO:

Explanatory note - Nevzorova V.S.;

The program of spiritual and moral development and education of students at the stage of primary general education. - Schroeder L.A., Korchagina GD.;

Planned results of mastering the main educational program of primary general education by students. - Solovieva L.A.;

Basic curriculum - Nevzorova V.S.;

The program for the formation of universal actions for students at the stage of primary general education - Gadlevskaya V.N.;

The program of individual subjects, courses - Belyanina O.P., Goncharova I.S.

The program for the formation of a culture of a healthy and safe lifestyle - Tikhomirova I.V;

The program of correctional work - Gadlevskaya V.N., Tyupina N.A.

The system for assessing the achievement of the planned results of mastering the basic educational program of primary general education - Nevzorova V.S., Gadlevskaya V.N.;

3. Approve the “Regulations on the working group on the introduction of the Federal State Educational Standard”

4. Organize methodological work with the team on the introduction of the Federal State Educational Standard.

Protocol #2

working group meetings

from 16.12.2010

Present: 9 people

"Organizational and methodological support of the Federal State Educational Standard of the new generation"

1. Head of MMO Gadlevskaya V.N. spoke on the organization of methodological work. She familiarized with the work plan for the organizational and methodological support of the introduction of the Federal State Educational Standard in the municipal educational institution "Padunskaya sosh".

2. Discussed the presented work plan, made some additions. The question was raised about the need to provide consulting methodological support for primary school teachers on the implementation of the Federal State Educational Standard.

3. Deputy director for water resources management Nevzorov V.S. spoke on the development of tools for studying the educational needs and interests of primary school students, requests from parents, diagnostics to identify professional difficulties for teachers during the transition to the Federal State Educational Standard.

4. Nevzorova V.S. and Gadlevskaya V.N. spoke on the issue of information support for the introduction of GEF IEO. We discussed the forms of informing the participants in the educational process about the progress of the introduction of the Federal State Educational Standard: the use of information resources of the educational institution (school website), the study of the opinion of parents through questionnaires, the holding of parent meetings, the organization of the parent lecture hall, the introduction of a section containing information on the progress of the introduction of the Federal State Educational Standard into the public report of the educational institution.

Resolved:

Approve the plan for organizational and methodological support for the introduction of the Federal State Educational Standard, with the possibility of necessary adjustments.

The teacher-psychologist Vyatkina N.A. draw up a package of methods for conducting diagnostics in educational institutions to study the needs and interests of all participants in the educational process in connection with the introduction of the Federal State Educational Standard.

Social pedagogue Samoshkina OA. to organize work with parents on the introduction of the Federal State Educational Standard.

4. Deputy Director for ICT Sorokina A.K. ensure the completion of the school website with documents and materials on the introduction of the Federal State Educational Standard.

Protocol #3

working group meetings

on the introduction of a new generation of Federal State Educational Standards

from 17.01.2011

Present: 7 people

Meeting question:

"Organization of extracurricular activities in the framework of the implementation of the second generation of the Federal State Educational Standards"

On this issue, the following spoke:

1. Deputy Director for Water Management Nevzorova V.S. acquainted those present with the directions of extracurricular activities within the framework of 10 hours of the basic curriculum, the number of hours for each direction.

2. Head of the IMO primary classes Gadlevskaya V.N. acquainted with the methodological materials for the introduction of the Federal State Educational Standard, provided by KRIPKiPRO, with exemplary programs for extracurricular activities for elementary school.

3. Discussed a possible option for the introduction of extracurricular activities - the use of educational programs after school hours on the basis of the municipal educational institution "Padunskaya sosh", since there are no institutions of additional education on the territory of the settlement of Padunskaya and nearby villages and there is practically no opportunity to carry out extracurricular activities in cooperation with other structures.

Resolved:

Organize the study and discussion of programs of extracurricular activities in the team.

Determine the optimal model for organizing the educational process, which ensures the variability of extracurricular activities of students, taking into account the possibilities of the school.

Organize methodological assistance to teachers in choosing programs for extracurricular activities.

Protocol #4

working group meetings

on the introduction of a new generation of Federal State Educational Standards

from 24.02.2011

Present: 7 people.

Agenda:

Analysis and approval of the explanatory note to the Federal State Educational Standard of the new generation at the initial stage

Discussion of the project of the planned results of the students' mastering the BEP of the IEO.

Proceedings of the meeting

A working group of 7 people considered an explanatory note to the main educational program of primary general education, developed in accordance with the requirements of the federal state educational standard of primary general education.

Nevzorova V.S., Deputy Director for WRM, spoke on the definition of strategic characteristics and goals for the implementation of the main educational program. . She noted that the novelty of the program lies in the fact that schoolchildren form the basis of the ability to learn, the ability to organize their educational activities, plan it, the ability to control and give self-esteem. This acquires features of adequacy and reflection.

On the second question, the head of the IMO of primary school teachers Gadlevskaya V.N. spoke. She drew the attention of those present to the three main groups of planned results of mastering the main general education program:

Personal results;

Meta-subject results;

Subject results.

The implementation of the main educational program is based on a system-active approach, which involves:

Education and development of personality;

Realization of personality in a particular educational institution;

Accounting for individual, age, psychological and physiological characteristics;

Ensuring continuity between the various levels of general and vocational education.

Resolved:

Approve an explanatory note to the PEP of the IEO of an educational institution as part of the introduction of a new generation of GEF at the initial stage.

To take as a basis the planned results of the students' mastering the BEP of the IEO.

Protocol #5

working group meetings

on the introduction of a new generation of Federal State Educational Standards

from 06.03.2011

There were: 7 people.

Agenda:

Analysis and approval of the planned results of the students' mastering the BEP of the IEO.

Discussion of the draft program for the formation of universal educational activities (UUD) for students at the stage of primary general education..

The course of the meeting.

On the first question, they listened to the head of the Ministry of Education of Primary School Teachers Solovyova L.A., who presented the material worked out on the planned results of the students' mastering the BEP of the IEO. The Federal State Educational Standard of Primary General Education establishes requirements for the results of students who have mastered the basic educational program of primary general education.

1. Personal. Including the readiness and ability of students for self-development, the formation of motivation for learning and cognition, the value-semantic attitudes of students, reflecting their individual-personal positions, social competencies, personal qualities; the formation of the foundations of civic identity.

2. Metasubject . Including universal learning activities mastered by students (cognitive, regulatory and communicative), ensuring the mastery of key competencies that form the basis of the ability to learn, and interdisciplinary concepts.

3. Subject. ATwhich include the experience, mastered by students in the course of studying the subject area, of activity specific to this subject area in obtaining new knowledge, its transformation and application, as well as the system of fundamental elements of scientific knowledge that underlie the modern scientific picture of the world.

The system of planned results gives an idea of what kind of actions - cognitive, personal, regulatory, communicative, refracted through the specifics of the content of a particular

another subject - students will master in the course of the educational process.

On the second question, they listened to the Deputy Director for Water Management Nevzorova V.S. and the head of the IMO Gadlevskaya V.N., who highlighted the main issues of the program for the formation of universal educational activities for students at the stage of primary general education. Discussed the concept of UUD, functions, their composition, types and characteristics of UUD in primary school age; connection of UUD with the content of educational subjects. The issue of ensuring the continuity of the program for the formation of universal educational activities during the transition from preschool to primary and basic general education was considered.

Resolved:

Approve the planned results of the students' mastering the BEP of the IEO.

To take as a basis the draft program for the formation of universal educational activities for students at the stage of primary general education.

To study, make additions to the draft program for the formation of universal educational activities for students at the stage of primary general education.

Protocol #6

working group meetings

on the introduction of a new generation of Federal State Educational Standards

from 19.03.2011

Present: 7 people.

Agenda:

Analysis and approval of the program for the formation of UUD (universal learning activities) for students at the stage of primary general education.

Discussion of the program of individual subjects, courses.

The course of the meeting.

On the first question, they listened to the head of the interschool methodological association of primary classes Gadlevskaya V.N., who outlined the program for the formation of UUD (universal educational activities). They represent a system of generalized personality-oriented goals of education that allow further refinement and concretization, which ensures the definition and identification of all components of the planned results to be formed and evaluated.

On the second question, they listened to primary school teachers Belyanina O.P. and Goncharov I.S. . They spoke about the main changes in the programs of subjects and courses. A feature of the content of modern primary education is not only the answer to the question of what the student should know (remember, reproduce), but also the formation of universal learning activities in personal, communicative, cognitive, regulatory areas that provide the ability to organize independent learning activities. It is also necessary to extend general educational skills and abilities to the formation of ICT - the competence of students.

Resolved:

Approve the programs for the formation of UUD (universal educational activities) for students at the stage of primary general education.

Take as a basis the program of subjects, courses.

To study, make additions to the developed programs of subjects, courses.

Protocol #7

working group meetings

on the introduction of a new generation of Federal State Educational Standards

from 23.03.2011

There were: 8 people.

Agenda:

Analysis and approval of the program of individual subjects, courses.

Discussion of the draft program of spiritual and moral development, education of students at the stage of primary general education.

The course of the meeting.

On the first question, they listened to primary school teachers Belyanina O.P. and Goncharov I.S., who highlighted the section of the PEP of the IEO "Programs of individual subjects, courses" with additions and changes.

On the second question, they listened to the deputy director for VR of the MOU "Padunskaya sosh" - Schroeder L.A., who outlined the regulatory, legal and methodological basis of the program of spiritual and moral development and education of students at the stage of primary general education.

The pedagogical organization of the process of spiritual and moral development and education of students provides for the coordination of the efforts of many social actors: schools, families, institutions of additional education, culture and sports, traditional religious organizations and public associations, including children's and youth movements and organizations. The program of spiritual and moral development and education of students contains eight sections. Korchagina GD introduced the participants to the content of these sections in more detail. During the meeting, the main issues on the proposed sections were discussed.

Resolved:

1. Approve the programs of individual subjects, courses.

2. Take as a basis the draft program of spiritual and moral development, education of students at the stage of primary general education.

3. Study the draft program of spiritual and moral development, education of students at the stage of primary general education, make additions and changes.

Protocol #8

working group meetings

on the introduction of a new generation of Federal State Educational Standards

from 30.03.2011

There were: 9 people.

Agenda:

Analysis and approval of the program of spiritual and moral development, education of students at the CEO level.

Discussion of the draft program for the formation of a healthy and safe lifestyle culture.

The course of the meeting.

On the first question, they listened to the deputy director for VR of the MOU "Padunskaya sosh" Shreder L.A., who outlined the program of spiritual and moral development, education of students at the CEO level with additions made.

On the second question, they listened to the Deputy Director for Life Safety of the Municipal Educational Institution "Padunskaya Sosh" Tikhomirova I.V. ., who spoke about the main points of the program for the formation of a culture of a healthy and safe lifestyle for students in accordance with the definition of the Federal State Educational Standard.

When choosing a strategy for educating a culture of a healthy and safe lifestyle in primary school age, it is necessary, taking into account the psychological and psychophysiological characteristics of age, to rely on the zone of actual development, based on the fact that the formation of the value of health and a healthy lifestyle is a necessary and obligatory component of the health-preserving work of the school. She further highlighted issues related to the new SANPIN.

Resolved:

Approve the program of spiritual and moral development, education of students at the NEO level

To adopt as a basis the draft program for the formation of a culture of a healthy and safe lifestyle.

Study the draft program for the formation of a culture of a healthy and safe lifestyle, make the necessary changes and additions.

Protocol #9

working group meetings

on the introduction of a new generation of Federal State Educational Standards

from 16.04.2011

There were: 8 people.

Agenda:

The course of the meeting.

On the first question, they listened to the deputy director for life safety of the municipal educational institution "Padunskaya sosh" - Tikhomirov I.V., who outlined the program for the formation of a culture of a healthy and safe lifestyle for students at the CEO level with additions made.

On the second question, they listened to the Deputy Director for Water Management Nevzorova V.S. which familiarized those present with the general provisions, the object, the main functions of the assessment system. The system for assessing the achievement of the planned results of mastering the main educational program of primary general education involves an integrated approach to assessing the results of education, which allows assessing the achievement by students of all three groups of educational results: personal, meta-subject and subject.

The head of the IMO of primary classes Gadlevskaya V.N. proposed for discussion the question of the features of assessing personal, meta-subject and subject results. We worked out the question of the "Portfolio of Achievements" as a tool for assessing the dynamics of individual educational achievements. She noted in her speech the fact that the portfolio of achievements is not only a modern, effective form of assessment, but also an effective tool for solving a number of important pedagogical tasks, which allows maintaining high educational motivation of students. We considered the issue of the final assessment of the graduate and its use in the transition from primary to basic general education.

Resolved:

1. Approve the program for the formation of a culture of a healthy and safe lifestyle.

2. To take as a basis the draft system for assessing the achievement of the planned results of the development of the BEP of the IEO.

To study the draft system for assessing the achievement of the planned results of the development of the BEP of the IEO, to make the necessary changes and additions.

Protocol #10

working group meetings

on the introduction of a new generation of Federal State Educational Standards

from 25.04.2011

There were: 7 people.

Agenda:

The course of the meeting.

On the first question, they listened to the Deputy Director for Water Resource Management Nevzorova V.S., who outlined the section of the OOP of the IEO “The system for assessing the achievement of the planned results of the development of the IEO of the IEO” with additions and changes.

On the second question, they listened to the teacher-psychologist of the municipal educational institution "Padunskaya Sosh", who introduced the audience to the main issues of the program of correctional work. The program is aimed at ensuring the correction of deficiencies in the physical and (or) mental development of children with disabilities (HIA) and assisting children in this category in masteringEducational program. Discussed t theoretical and methodological foundations,structure and contentremedial programs. Stopped to discuss the contentprogram modules: conceptual, diagnostic and consultative, correctional and developing, treatment and prevention, social and pedagogical.

Resolved:

3. Study the draft program of corrective work at the initial level, make the necessary additions and changes.

Protocol No. 11

working group meetings

on the introduction of a new generation of Federal State Educational Standards

from 03.05.2011

There were: 7 people.

Agenda:

1. Analysis and approval of the program of corrective work at the initial level.

2. Discussion of the model of the program of extracurricular activities in the framework of the introduction of the GEF of a new generation.

The course of the meeting.

On the first question, the primary school teacher N.A. Tyupina listened, who introduced the audience to the program of correctional work with the additions and changes made.

On the second question, they listened to the head of the IMO of primary classes Gadlevskaya V.N. who spoke about the chosen areas of extracurricular activities. The programs of extracurricular activities within the framework of 10 hours, which are offered by the Federal State Educational Standard, were considered.

Social pedagogue Samoshkina O.A. and primary school teachers: Belyanina O.P., Tyupina N.A., Goncharova I.S., Solovyova L.A., Korchagina G.D. acquainted those present with the results of a survey of parents of future first-graders on the issue of extracurricular activities. Parents would like: dance, artistic and aesthetic, intellectual, health-saving course, rhetoric.

Deputy director for water resources management Nevzorova V.S. proposed a model for organizing extracurricular activities in the municipal educational institution "Padunskaya sosh" for the 2011-2012 academic year in connection with the introduction of new federal state educational standards.

Resolved:

1. Approve the program of corrective work at the initial level.

2. To familiarize the teaching staff with the model of extracurricular activities for the 2011-2012 academic year, with the directions and programs of extracurricular activities in the 1st grade. Taking into account the wishes of the parents, decide on the choice of extracurricular activities for grade 1 for the 2011-2012 academic year.